English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this work I am interested in reflecting on a new figure that has been gaining presence in trials for crimes against humanity developed since 2005: that of the "context witness", that specialist -generally of the social sciences- who is presented as a witness and whose contribution is taken as testimonial evidence (Abbattista, Barletta & Lenci, 2016). For this, I will rely on my participation in the oral and public trial "Operative Independence (first part)", in which I stated about my doctoral research on the experience of soldiers conscripted in the south of Tucuman during the said Operation, between 1975 and 1977. In particular, I will argue that the social sciences can provide minute reconstructions of the logic of repression that help us understand how the exercise of state terror was possible.

sociohistórica/sociohistórica

El conocimiento antropológico en el marco del Proceso de Memoria, Verdad y Justicia. Reflexiones sobre una experiencia como “testigo de contexto” en el marco del Juicio “Operativo Independencia (primera parte)”