English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Mainstream literary critique develops its hypothesis on the poetics of Elias Castelnuovo with basis on the reading of Tinieblas (1923), his first book of short stories, while at the same time it points him out as the most representative author of the so-called Boedo group which, in the decades of 1920 and 1930, aimed at contributing to the elaboration of a revolutionary culture. The central critical developments about this book highlight its “naturalistic”, “coarsely realistic”, “pietistic” and “messianic” traits, as well as a “naive” and “schematic” political intent. Notwithstanding this, a re-reading of two of his stories, in  consideration of the tragicomic humor that their early reception perceived, enables the reconsideration of contemporary critical conclusions and the elaboration of new reading hypothesis.

El humorismo tragicómico en dos cuentos de Tinieblas (1923), de Elías Castelnuovo