English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The astronomical controversy between Carlos de Siguenza y Gongora and Eusebio Francisco Kino over the comet observed from the northern hemisphere in 1680 and 1681 has been read by the critics by means of dichotomic categories, silencing the complex map of actors involved in the production, publication and circulation of their scientific treaties. In the present article we propose to integrate the fields of Latin American Literary Studies and of Studies of Science, Technology and Society in order to compare those patronage and institutional networks, as well as rhetorical strategies, which have legitimized the contenders’ works through time.

orbis tertius

La legitimación de los saberes científicos en el siglo XVII novohispano. Sobre la controversia astronómica entre Carlos de Sigüenza y Góngora y Eusebio Kino