English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The objective of this article is to study, through the many cases that were brought before the Supreme Court, the conflicts regarding Mexican nationality in the early decades of the 20th Century, particularly the trials on stripping Mexicans, or those who considered themselves to be such, of their citizenship. At that time, the laws and mechanisms for defining who was a citizen were still in the process of construction, and there was both overlap between conflicting laws as well as legal limbos in which many individuals were trapped. This article addresses the problems faced by citizens who were forced to prove their citizenship, based on the hypothesis that those individuals whose cases reached the Supreme Court shared the characteristic of having been involved in some type of legal or political conflict. Instead of being processed by the courts, certain individuals were stripped of their citizenship in order to be deported under Article 33 of the Constitution, a much more expedited solution than traditional channels, as it did not allow for a defense.

historia mexicana/historia mexicana el colegio de méxico

Extranjeros hasta probar lo contrario. Conflictos en torno a la nacionalidad mexicana en la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación durante la primera mitad del siglo XX