English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The results of an empirical study of the influence of different types of orientation in communication on the formationof personal resource of interpersonal interaction are presented in the article. The analysis of the results of the studyconsisted of three successive steps to test the hypothesis that the type of orientation in communication affects the formationof the personal resource of interpersonal interaction. First, it is the clarification of the general trends in the manifestationof different types of communication orientation in modern youth. Second, it is the establishing the nature of the relationship between the types of communication orientation with the personal components of interpersonal interaction. Third, itis the comparison of groups studied by different types of orientation in communication. As a result of the study, it wasdetermined that three tendencies are most common in the communication of modern youth: a) to build it on mutual trust,respect, mutual understanding and openness; b) focus efforts on voluntary and selfless centering on the partner; c) treatpartners as a means, an object of covert manipulation. It is established in the process of correlation analysis that all typesof communication orientation in some way affect the formation of the personal resource of interpersonal interaction. Thisis most evident in the direct links of alterocentric tendencies with motivational, emotional, cognitive components and thegeneral indicator of the effectiveness of interpersonal interaction; as well as in the negative links of authoritarian andindifferent orientation with motivation, emotional and volitional regulation, and as a consequence, the personal basis ofinterpersonal interaction in general. Furthermore, the direct correlations of dialogic orientation of communication withthe motivational component, manipulative and conformal orientation with the cognitive component of interpersonal interaction were revealed. It was found by comparing groups of subjects with the dominance of different types of orientationin communication, that the alterocentric type more than other types contributes to the highest manifestation of personalresource of interpersonal interaction, manifested both at the level of all its components and overall efficiency of thisprocess. Authoritarian type leads to a deficient nature of the formation of personal resources, which reduces the effectiveness of interpersonal interaction. Dialogic orientation of communication is characteristic of young people with amoderate formation of all components of interpersonal interaction. A feature of young people with a predominance of conformal type of orientation is high self-confidence, independence, endurance and self-control. The dominance of theindifferent type leads to a lack of communication skills, and therefore representatives of this type often distort the feelingsof partners; they do not know how to negotiate.

ORIENTATION IN COMMUNICATION AS A PERSONAL RESOURCE OF EFFECTIVE INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION