English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Given that the decision making in legislative matter and of constitutional reform in Colombia is exercised by a representative body, the Congress - , and also citizen participation mechanisms that serve to promote or control the work of that organ are institutionalized - as the legislative initiative or referendum, it is feasible to conclude that the Colombian constitutional democracy prescribes a participatory model of democracy, at least trend. However, this conclusion does not answer the question about how the legislative decision should be adopted and, consequently, what is its procedural legitimacy. Thus, in view of the central importance - at least in normative - that the Constitutional Court has given parameter deliberation as constitutional validity of the statute or legislative act, it is feasible to say that the process leading to the establishment of such standards has a decidedly deliberative influence.

Influencia de la concepción deliberativa de la democracia en el procedimiento legislativo Colombiano