English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Historically, the film has not been an instrument or a system to analytically reflect about social sciences, and particularly about political science. Initially, social sciences thinkers went against considering fiction as alien to reality. The hegemonic presence of social sciences, specially the positivism era, turned cinema into something improperly scientific. Thus, judgments issued about it came, at first, from filmmakers, sometimes from spectators and, finally, from the newly come cinema critics. In other words, there was not yet a discourse of their own. However, narrative structures made visible by cinema encouraged emotional contributions linked to everyday life, and were not outside the social structure they represented: political imaginary and social interactions, forms of social control, micropolitics, among others would be analytical elements to establish relationships between political science and cinema.

ratio juris/ratio juris

Ciencia Política y cine, un modelo para armar. Los cuatrocientos golpes (1958) de François Truffaut, Pierrot el loco (1965) de Jean-Luc Godard. El cine en el contexto de la Ciencia Política