English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the writing on new New Zealand houses of the 1990s and the opening years of the twenty-fi rst century, frequent reference was made to “the Group”, taking in the Architectural Group (1946), Group Construction Company (1949-51), Group Architects (1951-64) and sometimes Wilson & Juriss (1964-68). Architects of award-winning houses acknowledged the infl uence of the Group on their work, and comparisons to Group houses became an accepted practice among critics. Meanwhile, historians of New Zealand architecture focused particular attention on one Group house: their fi rst, designed and built by the Group Construction Company in the North Shore, Auckland, suburb of Takapuna and known as the First House. In this later historicising literature, the 1948 assertion by the acknowledged Group leader, Bill Wilson, that “there is no architecture in New Zealand. NONE!” was framed as anticipating the 1949-50 design and completion of the First House. Justine Clark recognised that the First House “is now understood ... as the moment that modernism came to New Zealand” (2004: 51). In the 1990s and early 2000s, then, the Group in general, and the First House in particular, were entangled in a discourse about the origins of New Zealand architecture.

What’s in a Name? The First House in New Zealand architectural discourse