English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The history of writing error in the Qur'an derived from Aisha and justified by Khalifa Uthman bin Affan received a different responses among Islamic researchers, both from the strictly rejecting that history of writing ( riwayat ) until to those who accepted the existence the riwayat but with different "reading". On the legal side (juridical), the existence of that riwayat can result in juridical implications, especially in the methodological aspect. Such thought is not driven by the negative domain, but it must be in a positive domain, where the existence of that riwayat provides more progressive and responsive ijtihad , whether the answer is for the diversion to the difference of  qira’at  or not, the Islamic texts will be read more critically, so the legal purpose of “suitable in every time and place” would be reached.

IMPLIKASI YURIDIS RIWAYAT TENTANG KESALAHAN PENULISAN DALAM MUSHAF USMANI