English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purpose of this paper is to argue that coalition government is not able to achieve peace and stability in African governments as envisaged through political solutions. The paper therefore evaluates the effective use of the coalition model in political stability and promotion of national unity. The paper is conceptual in approach and it uses a desktop method. A coalition is a group of organisations or political groupings that come together for the purpose of gaining more influence and power than the individual organisations can achieve on their own. There are numerous African countries that have adopted the coalition government model for political compromise and stability in their government. The intention is to find out whether the model is practically effective because the model has both advantages and disadvantages. The paper concludes that coalition model is not suitable for the African context. It has shown to fail in numerous countries where it was tried. Introduction Where instability characterised the political environment in Africa, coalition government have been formed as a short-term solution. The purpose mainly has been to assure the society of the spirit of national unity within a country. In South Africa, the Transitional Constitution was adopted in 1993 lead by the then president Nelson Mandela through the government of national unity established with the apartheid architect, the National Party which ended in 1994, April 27, when the African National Congress won the majority votes in the first national democratic elections (SAHO, 1994:1). In Zimbabwe when the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) challenged the three-decade rule of the ZANU-PF and president Robert Mugabe, a government of National Unity was formed by president Robert Mugabe sharing power with MDC president Morgan Tsjangirai (Idasa, 2008:2). In Lesotho such happened when All Basotho Convention (ABC) formed by prime minister Thomas Thabane was joined by Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) and Basotho National Party (BNP) in coalition. The LCD was founded by Ntsu Mokhehle and is currently led by Mothejoa Metsing, the Basotho National Party(BNP) was found by Leabua Jonathan and is led by Thesele Maseribane, Lesotho was first governed by a coalition government in 2012 (Motamai, 2012:1). The question raised in this paper is whether the coalition model in African governance has ever effectively promoted national unity as espoused? Indeed, where it has been attempted no good results were achieved. In arguing for the effectiveness of the coalition model in achieving national unity, the paper will focus on understanding the nature of coalition governments, models of coalition government, strengths and weaknesses of coalition governments and whether coalition government lead to unity and political stability? Understanding the nature of coalition governments A coalition government is a cabinet of a parliamentary government in which several parties come together to form a unity government (Henry, 2009:149). On the other hand, Cheibub, Przeworski and Saiegh (2004:565) define coalition government as a group of legislators that belong to different parties that hold cabinet posts. The main reasons for this kind of arrangement is because there is no party that can achieve majority on its own in parliament. In a bi-party system, a dead lock may be created because the votes will even be among competing parties which leave the parties with no alternative except working together as a collective. A coalition government can also be formed in cases whereby there is a national crisis such as in time of war. Such arrangement grants the government some degree of legitimacy (Henry, 2009: 149). The Business and Management Review, Volume 11 Number 1 August 2020 Conference proceedings of the Centre for Business & Economic Research, ICBED-2020, 20-22 August 26 Coalition governments are possible as adopted by either the presidential or parliamentary system of government. In the presidential system, the popularly elected presidential candidate forms a government with cabinet members mainly drawn from his or her political party. This is because the presidential system is a unilateral act, however, the president may invite members of other parties as well (Japeth, 2008:19). However, in the parliamentary system, the party with most seats in parliament forms government and the leader of that party becomes the prime minister or the head of government. In case of parliamentary system, a coalition government results from formal negotiations among political parties in a country (Japeth, 2008:19). These types of governments advocate for representation and it is believed that coalitions lead to more consensus-based decisions. The government which is composed of diverse parties that have different ideologies would have to agree in regard to governmental policy decisions (Shodhganga, 2005:25). Adoption of a coalition government is a means of managing conflict and bringing about unity, which stems from the consociation (democracy) in divided societies (Kisobo, 2013:10). Coalitions are often designed to prevent the common enemy attaining power, and the system promotes representatives of diverse society. They result in accommodative politics that are also characterised by compromise, in which small and less powerful parties get an opportunity to voice their opinions in government and in public policy making. Furthermore, it provides for the majority of the electorate to be represented (Jacob, 2002:9). Coalitions also denote consensus. For decision-making process to take place, all partners ought to be consulted for consensus to be reached. If all the partners obey this principle of consensus, the coalition is likely to be more viable than a single-party majority, because with time the coalition would absorb the ideas and wisdom from different parties. Decisions that are made through consensus tend to carry more weight, due to the fact that they reflect the opinions of more than one actor (Tiwana, 2001:131). The stability of a coalition is also highly dependent on the equality of leadership, be it government or in the opposition (Jacob, 2002:10). In general, for coalitions to be a success, there must be a political force that is entitled to respect and allegiance due to the reliability of its political theory. Ideological homogeneity must be existent and a well-established leadership that is characterised with a common goal as well as being on the same wavelength with the central force (Raman, 2001:211). Models of coalition government As mentioned above, coalitions are formed for different reasons and are also formed in different kinds of systems or even under different kinds of circumstances. In this case, two categories of coalition governments are explained, namely classical coalition and consociational coalitions. These models differ in approaches. Classical coalition governments These are the type of coalitions formed mainly to attain parliamentary majority. Oguyi (2006:54) states that the formation of coalitions is usually the display of the absence of a dominant party that is capable of the governing. Elections play a vital role in formation of classical coalitions. Consequently, a government can be formed before or after the elections and this gives rise to the two types of classical coalition governments: the pre-electoral and the post-electoral (Japeth,2008:19). They are traditionally contained by political parties and elites for political convenience (Majeed, 2000:3). Pre-electoral coalitions This is a coalition model whereby different candidates are competing for a single office in which some candidates come together to form a coalition prior to the elections. Candidates who usually form elections are those who are both office and policy motivated. One candidate has to encourage the other to withdraw their candidacy by choosing a joint policy platform (Shin, 2018:162). Pre-electoral coalition is defined by Golder (2006:195) as a situation where various parties’ co-ordinate their electoral strategies rather than running for the office individually. Pre-electoral coalitions are likely to be formed by ideologically compatible parties. Parties usually resort to this type of coalition with the hope that they stand a better chance to win when they work collectively. Pre-electoral coalition governments have been witnessed in Mauritius and Kenya (Mutakha, 2007:109). In Kenya a coalition of six parties was formed with the aim of unseating the Jubilee party lead by Uhuru Kenyatta. The six parties were, the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), the Wiper Party, the Amani National Congress, Chama cha Mashinani, the The Business and Management Review, Volume 11 Number 1 August 2020 Conference proceedings of the Centre for Business & Economic Research, ICBED-2020, 20-22 August 27 Nark Kenya Party, the United Democratic Party and the Muungano Party (Kimani, 2017:1). On the other hand, Sithanen (2003:2) states that Mauritius has always been governed by a coalition government ever since it gained its independence. In Mauritius, the formation of coalitions is influenced by the officeseeking strategy more than other factors. For instance, Mouvement Militan Mauricien (MMM) joined forced with Movement Socialiste Mauricien (MSM) in order to ensure political victory (Sithanen, 2003:7) These parties came together to form a coalition before the elections could be held and this makes their alliance a pre-electoral one. Post-electoral coalitions In most cases, post-electoral coalitions are formed when the classical coalitions fail. They often fail when the ruling party is unable to return from the elections with majority of parliamentary seats. In this instance, the ruling party is forced to invite the opposing party in forming the government (Laver and Budge, 1992:15). If it was not for the shortage of seats in parliament, the ruling party would not be forced to form a coalition with an oppos

The choice of coalition governments for promotion of national unity in Africa: Does the model work for unity and political stability?