English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This research aims to determine differences in learning outcomes of students who use Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) and Contextual Approach (CTL) approaches on the set Material. This research method is quasi experiment with posttest only control design. The sampling technique was used cluster random sampling with 2 experimental classes These are experimental class 1 (the class was treated with the Realistic Mathematics Education (PMR) approach and experimental class 2 (the class was treated with the Contextual Learning (CTL) approach The hypothesis test is used the t-test. The results of the research is found that there were differences between the student learning outcome in the set material using Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) approach and the student learning outcome in the set material using the Contextual Learning approach (CTL). Because the student learning outcome in the set material using Realistic Mathematics Learning (PMR) approach better than the student learning outcome in the set material using the Contextual Learning approach (CTL).

al-jabar

The Differences of the Student Learning Outcome Using Realistic Mathematics Learning Approaches (PMR) And Contextual Learning Approaches (CTL) on the Sets Material