English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Debate between hadith scholar and Islamic jurisprudence has occurred since the time of the founding of fiqh madhhab that was dominated by Imam Abu Hanifah in Kufah (as a representation of ra’y), and Imam Malik in Medina (as a representation of hadith scholar). Then the figure of Imam al-Shafi’i emerged as the mediator for them, he was given the title Nasir al-Sunnah. This study explains the existence of scholars of hadith - Shaikh Abd al-Fattâh Abu Ghuddah - who adhered to Ahl al-Ra’y madhhab of Imam Abu Hanifah, defended the accusations against his madhhab, and also wanted to prove that Imam Abu Hanifah was a textualist. This is a library research using content analysis. This study indicated that Imam Abu Hanifah who was held by Abu Ghuddah as Ahl-al-ra’y madhhab did not make his madhhab understanding be rationalist in the field of hadith. He often in issuing fatwas based on ra’y. As a textualist cleric, he put nash in perseverance not prioritize qiyas and reason

THE DEFENSE OF HADITH SCHOLARS AGAINST AHL AL-RA’Y MADHHAB (Study of Thought Shaikh ‘Abd al-Fattâh Abû Ghuddah)