English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Korean Abstract:                ,          2000   1990         .             ,          .  , 2000            ,     .     ,      , 2000   1990      .     ,                .                 .English Abstract: This paper examines whether the TFP growth of the Korean economy slowed down in 2000s based on growth accounting, focusing on how sensitive the results are to the particular aspects of the growth accounting method. There has been no consensus on this issue as the previous studies have provided very diverse results due to the differences in the details of the growth accounting method. Main results of this paper are as follows. First, it is how to calculate the labor income of the self-employed that has the most significant impacts on the estimated TFP growth. Measuring capital stock also matters. Second, the TFP growth of the Korean economy appears to be sustained in 2000s when the extreme assumptions on the labor income of the self-employed are excluded and capital stock is measured by the most frequently-adopted method in the previous studies. For more reliable estimation of t he T FP growth, further studies on measuring the labor income of the self-employed are needed.

Evaluating TFP Growth of the Korean Economy in 2000s through the Comparison of Growth Accounting Methods