English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Preterm infants lack necessary thermoregulation. An ideal incubator should maintain a uniform and constant thermal environment. We compared the effectiveness of a supplemental heating blanket to improve the heating characteristics of two different incubator warming devices using assessment of their respective function alone as controls. Device A and device B, with and without a heating blanket (Harvard Apparatus), were instrumented with a distribution matrix of multiple temperature (n = 11) and humidity probes. These data were serially measured during warm up to 37.5 °C and through a series of open-door perturbations. The time constant, temperature variation, and change in air temperature were calculated. Data were analyzed for significance by 2-factor ANOVA for each respective incubator either turned on or off with either the heating blanket turned on or off. Device A warms faster (33.87% ; p &lt; 0.05) than device B, but has a greater (37.27% ; p &lt; 0.05) temperature variation during warmup. The heating blanket enhances the thermal response of device A during warmup, but does not alter those of device B. With the side door open, device A shows a smaller (-16.5% ; p &lt; 0.05) temperature variation than device B; the heating blanket attenuates the temperature change in both devices. These results demonstrate that the use of a supplemental heating blanket, as well as device-related differences, may impact clinical control of a thermal environment.

Prototype Hybrid Systems for Neonatal Warming: In Vitro Comparisons to Standard of Care Devices