English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Meso- and Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi show mainly calc-alkaline features. The mafic rocks have (Nb/La)pm1) = 0.13∼0.51, (Th/La)pm = 0.85∼3.3, Ti/Ti∗2) = 0.29∼0.79 and show negative Nb and Ti anomalies in primitive mantle normalized diagrams. The Mesoproterozoic mafic rocks have lower eNd(T) than those of Neoproterozoic, -1.99 ∼ -5.13 vs. -0.74 ∼ 2.4, respectively. They plot in the field of volcanic arc basalt in tectonic discrimination diagrams and display geochemical signatures of island arc volcanics. The mafic-ultramafic rocks are thought to be the products of magmatism of convergent plate boundary rather than derived from mantle plume. Therefore, they can not be regarded as an indicator of breakup of Rodinia supercontinent.

Geochemistry of Meso- and Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi, China: Arc or plume magmatism?