English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Copyright © 2013 by The Geochemical Society of Japan. Mathematical models and numerical simulations are necessary for risk assessment, monitoring, and assessment of the feasibility and financial issues associated with CO2 storage. There are a number of mathematical and numerical models applied to specific problems related to CO2 storage such as storage potential and capacity, leakage, groundwater quality, and CO2-trapping mechanisms in geological formations. Gaus et al. (2008) provided a detailed overview of geochemical and transport modeling approaches for CO2 storage and discussed their progress over the last 10 years. Numerical modeling of CO2 storage is usually divided into 3 categories; hydrodynamic, batch geochemical, and reactive transport modeling. The Eclipse code developed by Schlumberger is widely used for pure flow or hydrodynamic modeling of CO2 injection in the oil and gas industry. Batch geochemical modeling simulates geochemical fluid-rock interactions occurring in a formation. Since no-flow conditions are considered during batch geochemical simulation, batch modeling is ideal for modeling static laboratory experiments (e.g., Holubnyak et al., 2011). Not accounting for 2-D numerical modeling of CO2-water-caprock interactions at a potential CO2 storage site in Turkey