English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purpose of this study was to examine how the interpretability of a purchased product changes by mindset manipulations based on the Mental Simulation (MS) or Construal Level Theory (CLT). While the manipulation of MS associates the targeted products, that of the CLT does not. We investigated whether this difference affects the accuracy of the survey. In this experiment, participants were randomly assigned to four groups (photo-simulation manipulation (MS) vs. how-manipulation (MS) vs. low-level manipulation (CLT) vs. non-manipulation); they completed each task and conjoint measurement. The result of the experiment showed that photo-simulation manipulation and how-manipulation better contributed to the estimation of the real purchased product than non-manipulation did. However, this was not the case for low-level manipulation.

Is It Possible to Improve the Accuracy of Marketing Research by Mind-set Manipulation?: