English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Faced with an angry electorate, the prospect of term limits, and a potential third party full of disenchanted outsiders, political figures are renewing efforts for electoral reform after a twenty-year hiatus. Chanting the mantra of change, Bill Clinton won the presidency and pledged to restore the democratic process.' Ross Pero sounded a call to "clean out the barn," and garnered more support than any third party candidate has since Theodore Roosevelt.2 In 1992, voters in fifteen states passed ballot initiatives to limit the terms of their elected officials. Not since the post-Watergate period have the currents of political discontent been so strong and the prospects for overhauling election law so good. Nevertheless, today's reformers would do well to remember that the effort to alter election law ends not in the legislative arena but in the

Campaign Finance Reform and the Return of Buckley v. Valeo