English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Classroom nudity' and hate speech regulations 2 are two much publicized free speech issues that have arisen recently at the University of California at Berkeley (hereinafter "U.C. Berkeley" or "University"). Both topics raise important questions about the limits of tolerance for free expression at a large public university, particularly one with a long tradition of free speech activities, yet both deal with expression which many believe has little civic value. Pleas to protect hate speech, for instance, often take the form of arguments that if we do not protect speech and expression absolutely, we risk jeopardizing speech on public policy, the speech which First Amendment theory values most. Yet a greater threat to free speech on campus has gone largely unnoticed. In Smith v. Regents of the University of California, 4 the California Supreme Court ruled that the use of mandatory activity fees to fund political or ideological student groups at public universities violates the First

A Funny Thing Happens When You Pay for a Forum: Mandatory Student Fees to Support Political Speech at Public Universities