English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

t Clinical Professor of Law and Its Administration, and Director, Criminal Sentencing Program, Yale Law School; Editor, Federal Sentencing Reporter. This Article is informed by nearly two decades of exploring discretionary sentencing and its reform, in state and federal courts, in collaboration with an extraordinary group of students, judges, and colleagues. These ventures, illustrated in note 7, infra, would not have been possible without the educational vision and generous support of The Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation, 1972-1987, and The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation since 1988. I am especially grateful for wise criticisms and suggestions on earlier drafts by Milton Heumann, Morris Lasker, Pierre Leval, Marc Miller, Dale Parent, Aaron Rappaport, Michael Tonry, and Ronald Weich. My most enduring debt is to Judith Freed, for her remarkable insights and caring contributions throughout the project.

Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers