English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

A brief outline of the current model of due process jurisprudence is necessary to understand the doctrine that denies a group of aliens constitutional protection in immigration processes. The Constitution requires courts to engage in procedural due process scrutiny' whenever a "core interest"-an interest in a right that precedent recognizes as inherent in "life, liberty or property" 2 -is at stake.' For example, if a court rules that the right to procreate is inherent in the meaning of "liberty" and potentially affected by the outcome of an adjudication, then the court will proceed to analyze what process is due under the Constitution to safeguard that liberty interest." At the minimum, courts usually find that some kind of hearing preceded by proper notice is necessary to protect a due process interest.5 In defining the range of substantive rights protected by the due process clause,' courts have consistently held that there is no inherent right to enter the United States." This "entry doctrine" has serious consequences for excludable aliens, who, despite their physical presence in the United States, are legally considered to be detained at the border and still trying

Penetrating the Entry Doctrine: Excludable Aliens' Constitutional Rights in Immigration Processes