English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union concluded the first round of the Strategic Arms Limitations Talks (SALT I) wi'th agreements limiting anti-ballistic missiles (ABM's) and creating interim limits on offensive nuclear weapons.' This Note develops criteria for evaluating arms limitation agreements, and investigates the potential for using the SALT II agreements to regulate* the deployment of landbased and air-based mobile intercontinental ballistic missiles (mobile ICBM's). It concludes that an agreement banning or limiting the deployment of mobile ICBM's would be in the best interests of the United States, and would be worth specified concessions on the part of this country. This conclusion, however, is dependent upon the strategic context in the foreseeable future, and must be made with reservations concerning the relative strengths of United States and Soviet forces.

The SALT Process and Its Use in Regulating Mobile ICBM's