English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

small-plot tri8lm of effectlve herbkldu for manu8l woody-weed treatmenta should be validated on large trade where rapidity, tborougbna& 8nd effkiency of l ppliation are hltegr8l to oper8tion8l-ec8le recommendations. A 7.9 bectue woodland cbaininginUtab,witb248JunQrnuo~ Ton. (Little) and Ptnur monophyilu Torr. & Frem. saplinga per ba, was divided into niac2mby35(kndriprfortimcdtcbutbiunm~~~l,l_dimetbyl~byI)_l,3,CtntatzoC~ylylur) manual rppliation bids in fdll986 and 8ummer 1987. About 1 ba wae treated per hour, and 6 to 15% of the treee were missed. Three application metbode differed in total and aggregate time outlays, accuracy, and tediousness, but were bigbly similar in fornudated tebutbiuron expenditures of 1.5 to 2.0 kg/ha (0.21 to 0.28 kg/ha tebuthiuron r.i.). Time expenditures were moderately predictable (rZ = 0.62) from treated tree dendty and mean tree hdgbt, whereas percent tms missed wae unrelated to dendty or method. Placing herbidde particlem at the etem hue and baeing doeagea on stem height are preferable to dripline appliatione and crown-volume based doaage estimations.

Effects of Manual Application Method on Application Time, Thoroughness, and Tebuthiuron Outlays