English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

t B.A. 1991, University of Pennsylvania; J.D. Candidate 1994, University of Pennsylvania. This Comment was written in conjunction with Professor Seth Kreimer's Privacy and Disclosure seminar. I owe thanks to the Honorable Armand Arabian, AssociateJustice of the Supreme Court of California, and to Leonard Swyer for introducing me to this area of the law and for the opportunity to begin to address it. I am indebted as well to my fellow University of Pennsylvania Law Review members (especially Tony, Val, and Sal) for their editorial assistance. Finally, I appreciate the loving help and support of my parents, Sigmund and Susan, my family, and all of my friends. I dedicate this Comment to my father, not because he is a parental wiretapper, but because he continually inspires me to succeed in the law and in life. 1 MIRIAM VAN WATERS, PARENTS ON PROBATION 56 (1927). 2 William Safire, Telephone Traps, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 9, 1992, at A17. 3 Pub. L. No. 90-351, § 802, 82 Stat. 197, 211-25, reprinted in 1968 U.S.C.C.A.N. 237, 253 (current version at 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 (1988 & Supp. III 1991)) [hereinafter Title III]. 4 See S. REP. No. 1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 66 (1968), reprinted in 1968 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2112, 2153.

Title III at a Crossroads: The Ordinary Course of Business in the Home, the Consent of Children, and Parental Wiretapping