English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In the case Webster v Reproductive Health Services the Supreme Court saw three particular issues. The majority was able to avoid ruling on Missouris claim that life begins at conception by concluding that this passage was merely a value judgement. Restrictions of public funding for abortion clinics fit within court precedent upholding the exclusion of public support for abortion. And the viability test requirement as 20 weeks turned out to be nothing more than a doctors prerogative if it was medically appropriate. The result of all this is that the court managed to overrule Roe v Wade without discussing or overturning a womans right to privacy or bodily autonomy. This article is divided into several sections: an introduction arguments for the existence of a liberty interest for women arguments that reproductive choices are essential to a womans control of her won destiny and family life arguments for keeping reproductive choice in private hands as a key to a free society discussion of strict scrutiny examination of the threshold inquiry or finding an undue burden discussion of the questions of degree perspective and application examination of the justification stage discussions of attacks on Roes trimester approach arguments for the states interest in maternal health arguments for the states interest in potential life and explanations why the political process can not be trusted to achieve the desired outcome.

Abortion Politics: Writing for an Audience of One