English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Inequality mocks discourse. The absolute sovereign, assured that power will back up her every word,' needs but to speak. She needn't listen. As for the subject, silence is her fare. Hers is but to obey. Yet,inequality is a fact of life even where tyrants do not rule. The unequal distribution of natural talents and social opportunities continues to differentiate one individual from another, regardless of whether liberal or Marxist principles prevail. Does this inequality mean that discourse proceeds within multiple kingdoms of discrete and exclusive commonalities? Is this the pluralist vision: a cacophony of separate communities, each with its own shared experience, vision and language-a world in which experts speak to experts and lay publics to lay publics? Is it a world in which each group remains an anomaly to the rest, each lacking the discursive power to make sense to, much less persuade, those their communal voice excludes?

Dialects and Dominance: A Study of Rhetorical Fields in the Law of Confessions