English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In an economically interdependent world in which nations pursue differing economic policies, conflicts between differing economic norms are inevitable. Because antitrust laws embody and enforce the ideal of free competition, which has never been as warmly embraced by America's trading partners as it has in this country, enforcement of the American antitrust laws has provoked resistance by other countries." This conflict has both a substantive and a procedural aspect. Although there is no sharp line between procedure and substance, as both affect parties' rights, a distinction nevertheless can be made between what the antitrust laws forbid and how parties' rights are adjudicated under those laws. Although the underlying conflict concerns substantive law, much of the resistance focuses on procedural aspects of antitrust enforcement.2 One of the features that faces the strongest objections is

Antitrust Suits Involving Foreign Commerce: Suggestions for Procedural Reform