English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

A coalition of civil-liberties and public-interest-law groups recently addressed a letter of protest to the distinguished jurists and lawyers attending a national conference on law reform.1 The letter decried recent decisions of the Supreme Court that drastically limited access to the federal courts and accused the Court of "embark[ing] on a dangerous and destructive journey designed to dilute the power of the federal judiciary to serve as guardian of federal constitutional rights. '2 The letter contended further that "[i]f the trend ... is not reversed ... constitutional rights and liberties will be imperiled, and the people will be unable to defend themselves against arbitrary and unconstitutional actions of state officials .... 1,, The authors of the letter were reacting in large part to the

An Accommodation of the Younger Doctrine and the Duty of the Federal Courts to Enforce Constitutional Safeguards in the State Criminal Process