English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Massachusetts' recent experience in using auditors to help roll back trial delay in civil courts points up one of the toughest riddles in the enigma of delayed justice, namely, how astonishingly hard it is to tell whether a given delay "remedy" has worked or failed in practice. To some extent the men who devise the remedies help deepen the riddle of what happened by failing to provide in advance for the data that will be needed to answer that question. Their understandable attitude is that when a court is suffering from excessive delay in disposing of backlogged cases, its concern must be radical improvement, not the whys and wherefores or mechanics of the solution. They usually adopt countermeasures in packages, not singly. Afterwards, if the package as a whole has worked well, it is frustrating to try to learn which measure did what.

Auditors in Massachusetts as Antidotes for Delayed Civil Courts