English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Imagine that you are a celebrity, and when you type your name in as a domain name, www.yourname.com, you are brought to a web site that you neither created nor sanctioned. The site could be soliciting contributions for a charity you have never heard of, contain pornographic images, or even be auctioning off your name as a domain name while using the web site to advertise some other business. Each of these scenarios has occurred and has raised the ire of many celebrities attempting to protect one of the most valuable commodities that they control: the use of their names. Barry Diller, head of USA Networks, Inc., has filed one of the first lawsuits claiming illegal use of a celebrity name as a domain name and demanding compensation for the unjust enrichment enjoyed by the men who attempted to sell his name to the highest bidder. Diller's suit relies on the doctrine of publicity rights and attempts to extend the scope of this well established theory of recovery to the Internet.' Other celebrities have similarly fallen victim to such opportunistic behavior. Household names like Brad Pitt, Madonna, and

Celebrity Names as Web Site Addresses: Extending the Domain of Publicity Rights to the Internet