English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Minors who commit crimes are commonly placed under the jurisdiction of the state or federal juvenile justice system. Because juvenile status is statutorily rather than constitutionally mandated, juvenile courts may waive jurisdiction over young offenders, sending them to the adult criminal courts for trial.1 A juvenile waiver hearing is an individualized determination of whether jurisdiction over a given child should be ceded to adult criminal court. The juvenile court considers a wide variety of criteria in making this decision, including the child's age and criminal history, the severity of the offense, and the likelihood of successful rehabilitation in the juvenile justice system. In seeking waiver, the state often attempts to introduce a juvenile's own statements as evidence of her maturity or unamenability to treatment in the juvenile system. However, the use of these statements, which range from confessions to police at the time of arrest to statements made at court-ordered psychiatric evaluations, threatens juveniles' Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. While the Supreme Court has delineated the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination at adult criminal trials2 and at juvenile delinquency hearings,3 there has been no such resolu-

Extending the Privilege against Self-Incrimination to the Juvenile Waiver Hearing