English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Consider the following scenario: Company D imports electronic components from Asia. Company P distributes components to end-use manufacturers. Companies P and D enter into a joint venture where orders placed with P will be filled by D, and the net proceeds upon resale split equally. Company D, however, falsely inflates its import costs, thereby cheating P out of a portion of the profits. A federal grand jury is convened, subpoenas all of Company D's financial records, and returns an indictment charging D with mail fraud, wire fraud, and criminal RICO. Meanwhile Company P files suit against Company D, pursuant to civil RICO provisions, seeking treble damages. Central to P's case are documents chronicling D's component purchasing, including actual invoices and accounting entries. P serves D with a request for production of those documents. D responds that it no longer has the documents: they have been subpoenaed by the grand jury. Company P then contacts the United States Attorney supervising the investigation-or, perhaps, the court directly-requesting access to the documents. Will Company P's request be granted? A starting point for analysis is Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2), which provides:

FRCrP 6(e) and the Disclosure of Documents Reviewed by a Grand Jury