English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The current controversy about abortion involves two very different kinds of issues. First, there are arguments about the morality of abortion and its prohibition. Second, there are questions of fact about the extent to which criminal law regulation has an impact on the rate of abortions and other incidents of social life. These ethical and empirical issues are distinct: the morality of criminal law restrictions on abortion is independent of the degree to which such laws are effective.' Still, the extent to which law changes behavior in this area is of interest to scholars and legislators and the subject of heated debate.2 In the United States, legal regulation of abortion has traditionally been a matter of individual state policy, but until recently all states prohibited abortion except in narrowly defined situations. Recent legislation in a number of states has, however, made medical abortion available to greater numbers of pregnant women-in some states to all women who can afford the operation.3 In March, 1970, Hawaii's law

Of Doctors, Deterrence, and the Dark Figure of Crime: A Note on Abortion in Hawaii