English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

N 1947, when Congress amended the National Labor Relations Act by adopting the Taft-Hartley proposals, it established the independent office of General Counsel of the Board and to that office assigned many of the administrative and prosecuting functions which had previously been performed by the Board. The purpose of stripping the Board of these powers was, as the Report of the Conference Committee explained, to limit the Board "to the performance of quasi-judicial functions." 1 At the same time, Congress increased the membership of the Board from three to five. By March, 1954, as a result of resignations and expirations of Board members' terms of office, the Republican administration elected in 1952 had filled a majority of the seats with its own appointees. Since that time many changes in NLRB policy have been effectuated through the decisional process. It is the purpose of this paper to examine some of these changes and, through them, to evaluate the new Board's performance of its statutory function.

Policy-Making by the New "Quasi-Judicial" NLRB