English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Methods for wetland bioassessment using macroinvertebrates are not well developed. Two of the most controversial issues in stream bioassessment, subsampling and taxonomic resolution, have yet to be quantitatively addressed for wetlands. Using a multivariate approach, we evaluated the efficacy of family-, genus-, and species-level assemblage data in reflecting the environment and distinguishing impaired sites from the reference condition. We used 5 basic levels of subsampling (100-, 200-, and 300-organism fixed counts; 10% and 25% fixed areas), an integrated subsample requiring a minimum fixed count and fixed area (100&10%), and 100-count and 10%-area subsamples coupled with a supplementary large-rare (LR) search. Data were obtained from 1.5-m2 composite samples collected from 126 plots along a 10-km-long eutrophication gradient in the Florida Everglades. Our results suggest that effectiveness of subsampling depended more upon the minimum number of individuals retained than minimum area or proportion of the sample picked. Fixed-area subsamples were generally less efficient than fixed counts, with 200- and 300-individual fixed counts resulting in significantly greater assemblage-environment relationships and much higher accuracy in detecting impairment than 10% fixed area, despite averaging similar numbers of individuals. The greatest improvement with increasing subsample size was observed between fixed counts of 100 and 200 individuals; detecting impairment, in particular, was not markedly improved with subsample sizes >200 individuals. Supplementing subsamples with a LR search resulted in only very slight improvements in assemblage-environment relationships, but was effective in improving prediction accuracy, particularly for family-level data. However, family-level assemblage-environment relationships and abilities to detect impairment were inferior to genus- and species-level data, regardless of subsample size. Species-level data performed best, primarily because of the large proportion (>20%) of total species belonging to Chironomidae. The potential importance of Chironomidae to wetland bioassessment was further revealed through an evaluation of a tiered-taxonomic approach, which showed that non-Chironomidae family-level data tiered with species-level Chironomidae data produced results very similar to those obtained using genus- or species-level data exclusively. Our results suggest that fixed counts ≥200 or integrated fixed-area/fixed-count approaches that consistently obtain a minimum of 200 individuals should be considered as minimum subsample sizes for wetlands. We additionally advocate LR searches and recommend genus- or species-level taxonomy, particularly for the Chironomidae.

Evaluating Subsampling Approaches and Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Resolution for Wetland Bioassessment