English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Social experiments conducted in Pennsylvania and Washington tested the effect of offering Unemployment,Insurance (UI) claimants a cash bonus for rapid reemployment.,This paper combines data,from the two experiments,and uses a consistent framework,to evaluate the experiments and determine with greater certainty the extent to which a reemployment bonus can affect economic,outcomes. Bonus,offers in each of the experiments,generated statistically significantbut relatively modest,reductions in UI receipt. Since the estimated impacts on UI receipt were modest, the reemployment bonuses did not generate the UI savings necessary to pay foradministering and paying the bonuses. Hence, contrary to earlier findings from a bonus experimentconducted in Illinois, findings from the Pennsylvania and Washington experiments strongly suggest,that a reemployment,bonus,is not a cost-effective method,of speeding the reemployment,of UI claimants. Paul T. Decker

Evaluating Pooled Evidence from the Reemployment Bonus Experiments