English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

about the states are inappropriate and odd, Rubin and Feeley argue, but they do not seriously interfere with Americans' way of life.2 Judges and commentators express a fond regard for the states, but they tend to favor only the most modest judicial efforts at preserving local autonomy; they hem in their federalism doctrine so that it can do little to threaten what is, in fact, a profound commitment to national unity. Lynn A. Baker and Ernest A. Young do not hedge.3 Unlike Rubin and Feeley's neurotics, who are burdened with an unnecessary obsession, but who do not let it interfere with their healthy pursuit of

Why Talking about "States' Rights" Cannot Avoid the Need for Normative Federalism Analysis: A Response to Professors Baker and Young