English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In two seminal cases, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and a U.S. federal district court recognized the immunity of the Congo's Foreign Minister Abdulaye Yerodia Ndombasi2 and Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe.3 These decisions establish a coherent framework for deciding difficult and politically sensitive questions of immunity that addresses the competing goals of promoting international discourse, respecting the sovereign equality of states, and ensuring accountability for serious international crimes. By establishing clear and predictable rules that define when a state's leaders may travel abroad freely without fear of arrest, this framework promises

Diplomats or Defendants? Defining the Future of Head-of-State Immunity