English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Since the dawn of the computer age, Congress and the courts have struggled with the practical and conceptual difficulties of providing intellectual property protection for computer programs. The Computer Software Copyright Act of 1980,1 enacted in response to these difficulties, took several important steps toward the formulation of a fair and workable form of intellectual property protection for computer programs, while leaving many questions unanswered. Much of the debate over the effect and scope of the protection of computer programs has centered on issues such as which aspects of computer programs are subject to copyright protection2 and whether copyright is even the appropriate form of intellectual property protection for computer programs at all.3 Courts have also struggled to determine which uses of copyrighted programs by ordinary consumers should be permitted and which should be proscribed.4 One effect of the uncertainty regarding the scope of copyright protection for computer programs has been a "crescendo of litigation" in this field.'

The Uncertain Future of Computer Software Users' Rights in the Aftermath of MAI Systems