English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Calculating the proportion of administrative law scholarship that sets for itself the goal of rethinking, reconstructing, refocusing, or otherwise dramatically reconsidering the field would be an interesting task. I suspect the proportion of such work is higher in administrative law than in most other subjects, perhaps because so many of those in the field find the conceptual foundations of administrative law, and the results of so much judicial and scholarly labor, unsatisfying.3 In addressing the administrative problems of today, I seek to challenge the doctrinal separation that has evolved between (1) politics and the partisan struggle over political ideology and public policy, and (2) the realm of legal theory, the source of most prescriptions for the reform of legal doctrines and institutions. Part of this challenge entails sketching

The Governance Crisis, Legal Theory, and Political Ideology