English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

W HEN the Department of Justice recently took three distribution cases to the Supreme Court, it obviously hoped to broaden and clarify existing law as applied to the distributive process-White Motor Co.' having failed to be a good vehicle. Now that General Motors Corp.,2 Sealy, Inc.,3 and Arnold, Schwinn & Co.4 have been decided it may be useful to examine these three cases to determine to what extent they have altered traditional antitrust law.

Distribution and the Sherman Act: The Effects of General Motors, Schwinn and Sealy