English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

T IS PROBABLY not at all -unusual for the immediate consumers of litigation processes, the litigants, to feel that the results they get from law are obtuse. Litigants are actualizing agents for the processes of law, but what happens to them thereafter in legal processes may have little to do with their entering needs and dispositions. This is because there are notable psychological discontinuities and irritations in legal experience, at least from a litigant's viewpoint. Litigant aims and needs, attorney analysis and tactics, and law's structural apparatus for producing litigation decisions--courts and trial procedure--each have disparate psychological characteristics. In their psychological attitudes, they frustrate and may interfere with one another. Mostly, it is the litigant or litigants-the direct consumers of litigation processes-who are injured. Their aims and needs are excluded or ignored. And, it is precisely this consequence that the legal profession can ill afford and would do well to avoid in the existing highly competitive market for appropriate skills and services.

Psychological Discontinuities in the Litigation Process