English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Now there ain't nobody nowhere nohow gonna ever understand me the way you did. Bruce Springsteen1 In 1985, I published in the Michigan Law Review a review2 of a recent book by Professor Robert S. Summers on the legal philosophy of Lon Fuller.3 Professor Summers has published in the Cornell Law Review an ironically titled criticism of my review4 and of another review.5 In a number of respects, Professor Summers' Assessment has served to increase my understanding of his book, and I trust that other readers will be similarly benefited. Although Professor Summers' response to my review of his book takes issue with what I said on a number of points, I strongly suspect that few readers would be interested in a detailed defense of what I said in that review. Such an exercise is likely to be as unproductive to the participants and as incomprehensible to the reader as the "He said I said . . . but what I really said was ... and anyway what I meant was ... and only an idiot would think that I meant . . ." exchanges between gonzo historians that fill the back pages of the New York Review of Books. Several of the points that Professor Summers makes are worthy of some further attention, however, if for no other reason than that they demonstrate

An Interested Response to a "Wholly Disinterested Assessment": LeBel on Summers on LeBel on Summers on... Er... Um... Oh, Yeah... Fuller