English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

sixteen years that he occupied the office, Warren benefited from extravagant praise by public figures and friendly scholars, and from condemnation by racial bigots, Birchers, and religious zealots. When Warren retired from the Supreme Court in 1969 and again when he died five years later, it was said that an era had passed with him: a moral epoch, which somehow he personified, had ended.' In the nine years since Warren's death, his enemies and critics have found new targets, but his place in history is now jeopardized by some of his best friends or at least those sympathetic to the era and the man who symbolized it. G. Edward White and Bernard Schwartz, both of whom must be counted among Warren's friendly critics,2 have produced book-length studies that focus on the Chief Justice and the Court over which he presided. Both books claim to be biographies in the traditional sense, but neither is: White has written an extended essay attacking what he sees as the conventional historical stereotype of Warren,3 and Schwartz has produced a term-by-term narrative, with occasional asides, about the Court's deliberations and major constitutional decisions between 1953 and 1969. White's book, for all its scrupulous attention to the facts and its elegant presentation, reads more like a brief than a biography, and a curiously dated brief at that. The issues for White are the issues shaped by Warren's severest academic critics in the 1960s. In order to rescue Warren post mortem, White resorts to rather slippery definitions of

Hail to the Chief: Earl Warren and the Supreme Court