English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Suppose that by some mysterious process the police in your town received each Monday a list of all the robberies and burglaries committed during the preceding week and the names of the persons who committed them. Suppose further that the list itself was admissible in evidence at trial and generally led to conviction. And suppose finally that persons considering committing offenses knew that the police had such a list and used it, relentlessly tracking down the miscreants named on it. Under such circumstances, one would probably expect that many potential offenders in the town with the magical list would resist the temptation to rob or burgle stores. For one offense, such a list does exist. For over fifty years, each county government in Michigan has maintained an agency called the Friend of the Court that is responsible for receiving all child-support payments from parents under orders of support after a divorce or adjudication of paternity. The agency knows on Monday if the parent under an order of support failed to make a payment the preceding Friday, and the parent under an order of support, almost always the father, knows that the agency knows. He is also aware

Men Who Know They Are Watched: Some Benefits and Costs of Jailing for Nonpayment of Support