English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The Supreme Court's endorsement of the fraud-on-the-market theory in Basic, Inc. v. Levinson 1 established the efficient capital markets hypothesis (ECMH), a cornerstone of modern finance theory,2 as a decisive tool for resolving legal disputes involving securities fraud and matters of corporate disclosure.3 Although the ECMH has long been an integral part of legal scholarship on the nature and purpose of securities regulation,4 courts have treated it with suspicion, except when

Good Finance, Bad Economics: An Analysis of the Fraud-on-the-Market Theory