English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The English jury evokes passionate and often extreme views. On the one hand, trial by jury is vigorously defended as an ancient right, a bastion of liberty, and a means whereby the ordinary person’s common sense views can inform decisions and contain the powers of government. On the other hand, the jury is regarded much more cynically as a costly, sometimes incompetent anachronism that merely creates opportunities for exploitation by “professional” criminals at great public expense. This century in England, the second of these views appears to have gained ground. The scope and powers of the English jury have markedly declined, and jury trials are increasingly seen as excessively expensive and time consuming. Juries have all but disappeared in civil cases, and their use in criminal cases is continually threatened by sustained

Decline of the "Little Parliament": Juries and Jury Reform in England and Wales