English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

In the wake of revolutionary political and economic developments on the international stage,' increasing numbers of foreign issuers and investors seek to tap U.S. securities markets.2 As this trend continues, more plaintiffs will no doubt seek redress against foreign non-resident defendants for violations of U.S. securities laws.3 As threshold issues in such cases, courts will need to consider whether due process allows them to exercise personal jurisdiction over such foreign entities in light of the jurisdictional provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,4 and whether to dismiss such cases for forum non conveniens.

Haling Foreign Subsidiary Corporations into Court under the 1934 Act: Jurisdictional Bases and Forum Non Conveniens