English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

No feature of modem U.S. government has been more controversial over the last decade than review of agency rules by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") and other parts of the Executive Office of the President.1 And yet, despite all the controversy, no president, not Bill Clinton2 and probably not even Ross Perot, would dream of abolishing review of agency actions by the OMB, or some other entity in the Executive branch. Indeed, on October 4, 1993, after this article was presented, President Clinton signed an Executive Order revising the OMB regulatory planning and review process,3 and incorporating some of the suggestions made in this article.4 Clark Clifford explains: "If a President did

TQM-Ing OMB: Or Why Regulatory Review under Executive Order 12,291 Works Poorly and What President Clinton Should Do about It