English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Recognition of the significance of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 19701 for the law of torts and of particular elements of the law of torts for the administration of the Act is emerging slowly in reference to two areas of inquiry. First, to what extent are persons charged with invocation and application of the Act's enforcement provisions required or permitted to read concepts of tort law into the duties imposed and the defenses allowed under the Act?2 Second, are any new rights, remedies, or other substantive or procedural advantages added to the arsenals of plaintiffs' attorneys seeking redress for clients injured as a result of alleged violations of the Act?3 Before discussing those two questions,4 this article briefly explores the broader implications of the Act for the future of accident law in general.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the Law of Torts